The Birth of a Nation


3h 7m 1915
The Birth of a Nation

Brief Synopsis

In this silent film, families from the North and the South fight to survive the Civil War and its aftermath.

Photos & Videos

Film Details

Also Known As
The Clansman
Genre
Drama
Historical
Silent
Release Date
Feb 8, 1915
Premiere Information
not available
Production Company
David W. Griffith Corp.
Distribution Company
Epoch Producing Corp.
Country
United States
Location
Calexico, California, USA
Screenplay Information
Based on the novel The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan by Thomas Dixon (New York, 1905) and his play of the same name (New York, 8 Jan 1906).

Technical Specs

Duration
3h 7m
Sound
Silent
Color
Black and White
Theatrical Aspect Ratio
1.33 : 1
Film Length
12 reels

Synopsis

Many years after Africans are brought in chains to America, the nineteenth century abolitionists demand that the Africans' descendants be freed. Phil and Tod Stoneman, sons of abolitionist leader and congressman Austin Stoneman, visit Phil's school friend, Ben Cameron, and his family in Piedmont, South Carolina. Phil courts Ben's sister Margaret, while Tod and Ben's young brother Duke become friends. When President Abraham Lincoln calls for volunteers, Phil and Tod return, but first, Ben playfully steals Phil's locket which contains a portrait of Phil's sister Elsie. During the war, Duke and Tod die in each others' arms. Northern guerrillas raid Piedmont and devastate the Cameron home. After Atlanta is burned and General Sherman marches to the sea, Ben, leading an heroic, but unsuccessful counterattack against General Grant's campaign on Petersburg, is wounded and rescued by Phil. At a Washington hospital, Ben meets Elsie, now a nurse. Ben's mother visits and successfully pleads to Lincoln for Ben's pardon from an unfounded charge. After Lee's surrender and Lincoln's assassination, Stoneman assumes great power in Congress. He sends his protégé, the mulatto Silas Lynch, to Piedmont, where the whites are disenfranchised. Lynch is elected lieutenant governor, and illiterate blacks gain control of the legislature and courts. To oversee Lynch's progress, Stoneman travels to Piedmont with Phil and Elsie. Ben and Elsie become engaged, but Margaret, prideful over the South's loss, is cold to Phil. To respond to the injustice which he feels, Ben forms the Ku Klux Klan. When Elsie learns that Ben is a clansman, she breaks their engagement. After Gus, a black soldier who becomes one of Lynch's followers, finds Flora, Ben's youngest sister, alone in the woods, he asks her to marry him. She runs in fright, and jumps off a cliff because she thinks that Gus will rape her. After she dies in Ben's arms, Gus is captured and hanged by the Klan. Dr. Cameron is arrested for having Klan costumes in his house, and although Phil and the Cameron's black servants rescue him, they become entrapped, with Margaret and Mrs. Cameron, in a country cabin. As black militia troops invade the streets of Piedmont, Lynch asks Elsie to be the queen of his black empire. Repelled, Elsie barely fends off Lynch. Her father arrives and is also horrified by Lynch's proposal, but he is powerless to prevent a forced marriage. After Ben leads the Klan's ride to rescue Elsie and Stoneman--and afterward, the Camerons--the blacks are disenfranchised. Margaret and Phil honeymoon with Ben and Elsie. In an allegorical epilogue the millenium is depicted wherein Christ's resurrection binds nations with brotherhood and love.

Film Details

Also Known As
The Clansman
Genre
Drama
Historical
Silent
Release Date
Feb 8, 1915
Premiere Information
not available
Production Company
David W. Griffith Corp.
Distribution Company
Epoch Producing Corp.
Country
United States
Location
Calexico, California, USA
Screenplay Information
Based on the novel The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan by Thomas Dixon (New York, 1905) and his play of the same name (New York, 8 Jan 1906).

Technical Specs

Duration
3h 7m
Sound
Silent
Color
Black and White
Theatrical Aspect Ratio
1.33 : 1
Film Length
12 reels

Articles

The Birth of a Nation (1915) - The Birth of a Nation


D.W. Griffith's epic production The Birth of a Nation had its United States premiere on February 8, 1915, and almost a century later it's still a strong contender for most controversial movie ever made. Its historical importance and cinematic ingenuity are unquestionable, which explains the positive side of its reputation. The negative side is explained by a single overwhelming factor - the unapologetic racism that runs through the picture from beginning to end. Based on a novel by Thomas Dixon, Jr. called The Clansman, the movie's plot is complex and sometimes confusing, but the review in Variety on March 12, 1915, summed it up in a sentence: "The Camerons of the south and the Stonemans of the north and Silas Lynch, the mulatto Lieutenant-Governor, the Civil War...the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the period of Carpet-bagging days and union reconstruction following Lee's surrender, the terrorizing of the southern whites by the newly freed blacks and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan that later overpowers the negros [sic] and gives the white men the authority rightfully theirs." Although reviewer Mark Vance displays a racial prejudice equal to Griffith's own, his high opinion of the film was echoed by many likeminded critics - and bitterly contested by others who found Griffith's technical resourcefulness a meager compensation for the picture's bigotry, insensitivity, and historical spin.

Griffith claimed that his sole intention was to tell the story of the Civil War and the postwar Reconstruction era as they really happened, from his own perspective as a Southerner who accepted the outcome of the war, and that offending black Americans was the last thing he wanted to do. To this end he adapted a novel in which the KKK is the hero, and arranged for all the black characters (except some extras) to be played by white actors in blackface. Watching the film today, it's hard to believe Griffith actually thought black moviegoers - or many white ones - would enjoy his portrait of slaves and former slaves as slow-witted, servile, sexually rapacious dullards who would have ruined the nation if the KKK hadn't been invented in the nick of time. If he did think that, he was incredibly thickheaded.

And so he was. Judging from historical records and film scholarship, Griffith was genuinely surprised by the uproar surrounding the movie's release. Born in rural Kentucky to a Confederate Army officer who had fought in the Civil War and returned with countless tales of Confederate heroism, Griffith saw the war and Reconstruction from a Southern perspective he never questioned. This helps account for the racism in The Birth of a Nation, but it doesn't excuse Griffith's failure to challenge the version of history he'd absorbed in childhood, especially since in other areas of life he was what we'd now call a liberal or progressive - deploring the excesses of capitalism in A Corner in Wheat (1909), for instance, and condemning various forms of bigotry in Intolerance (1916). When a 1915 editorial in the New York Globe attacked The Birth of a Nation for pandering to "depraved tastes" and fomenting "a race antipathy that is the most sinister and dangerous feature of American life," Griffith shot back a letter saying that by "following the formula of the best dramas of the world we establish our ideals by revealing the victory of right over wrong." His equation is both malevolent and simplistic: freed slaves enjoying their freedom equals wrong, the KKK murdering their liberty equals right.

The Birth of a Nation cost about $110,000 to make, equivalent to several million dollars today; the battle scenes alone have been estimated at $40,000. Financing came from private investors rather than established production companies, because of the project's unusual nature and also because Griffith was now based in the Southern California area that would soon become Hollywood, far from the New York hub of the pre-1915 film industry. Griffith worked from a plot outline rather than a formal script, researching historical details with the help of four assistants. Production began on the Fourth of July in 1914 and wrapped on Halloween, and the final twelve-reel cut debuted under the film's original title, The Clansman, at Clune's Auditorium in Los Angeles, running there for seven months. By the time of its New York opening in March - at the Liberty Theater, where it played for eleven months - it had received its new and permanent title, apparently because Dixon felt the title of his novel wasn't imposing enough for so magnificent a film. Bad record-keeping has kept the movie's profits from being precisely calculated to this day, but film historian Anthony Slide reckons that it has "probably been seen by more people than any other film." While that may have changed with the advent of global blockbusters by the likes of James Cameron and Steven Spielberg, the cumulative audience for Griffith's epic has surely been of epic proportions.

And no wonder, since The Birth of a Nation was a groundbreaking entertainment in its day. Longer and more exciting than any American picture to date, it lured middle-class and wealthy patrons back to the movies, which had catered to working-class audiences during the nickelodeon era. According to the official souvenir program for its first road-show engagements, 18,000 people and 3,000 horses appear on the screen; making the KKK uniforms took up more than 25,000 yards of white cloth; and nearly 200,000 feet of film were shot, edited to 12,000 for the final cut, which ran about three hours and ten minutes at the then-usual projector speed of 16 frames per second. On top of these high-end production values, the film was endorsed by no less a personage than Woodrow Wilson, the president of the United States, who remarked, after seeing it in the first-ever movie screening at the White House, "It is like writing history with Lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true."

Rave reviews from Wilson and many critics helped The Birth of a Nation become cinema's first blockbuster, but they didn't persuade everyone that the picture was benign. Before its New York premiere, the NAACP pushed both the motion-picture industry and national censors to condemn or at least censure the picture, winning only a few token trims with their efforts. Griffith's characteristic response to such attacks was "to insist on the sincerity of his art," in the words of biographer Richard Schickel, and "to associate his cause with the cause of free speech and a free press." Later the NAACP organized protests outside the Manhattan theater where it was playing, and an April showing in Boston resulted in a full-scale riot; but these and other expressions of outrage did little to dampen the film's popularity. Contention has arisen many times since, as when an Atlanta censorship board banned it in 1959, and when the town of Riverside, California, which had hosted the film's first prerelease screening in 1915, canceled a showing at its museum in 1978. The right to exhibit it was challenged at least 120 times between 1915 and 1973, according to film scholar Janet Steiger.

The narrative energy and technical wizardry of The Birth of a Nation speak for themselves to those who view the film today. As for its ideological failings and noxious views, no one has better articulated the case against them than the pioneering social worker Jane Addams, who spoke about it with the New York Post during its initial New York run. Calling it a "pernicious caricature of the Negro race" that is both "unjust and untrue," Addams reproached it for portraying blacks as "worse than childish and brutal and vicious--actually grotesque and primitive and despicable." In remarks that ring far truer than Griffith's shifty defenses, she observed that you "can use history to demonstrate anything when you take certain of its facts and emphasize them to the exclusion of others." The glimpses of real history in The Birth of a Nation serve only to make the film more insidious, she added, promoting "the most subtle of untruths - a half truth." Those words from 1915 are worth recalling when we explore Griffith's racist blockbuster in the twenty-first century.

Director: D.W. Griffith
Producer: D.W. Griffith
Scenario: D.W. Griffith and Frank E. Woods, based on Thomas F. Dixon, Jr.'s novel The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan
Cinematographer: G.W. Bitzer
Film Editing: D.W. Griffith, Joseph Henabery, James Smith, Rose Smith, Raoul Walsh
Music: Joseph Carl Breil
With: Lillian Gish (Elsie Stoneman), Mae Marsh (Flora Cameron), Henry Walthall (Col. Ben Cameron), Miriam Cooper (Margaret Cameron), Mary Alden (Lydia Brown), Ralph Lewis (Austin Stoneman), George Seigmann (Silas Lynch), Walter Long (Gus), Robert Harron (Tod Stoneman), Wallace Reed (Jeff), Jos. Henabery (Abraham Lincoln), Elmer Clifton (Phil Stoneman), Josephine Crowell (Mrs. Cameron), Spottiswoode Aitken (Dr. Cameron), J.A. Beringer (Wade Cameron), Maxfield Stanley (Duke Cameron), Jennie Lee (Mammy), Donald Crisp (Gen. Ulysses S. Grant), Howard Gaye (Gen. Robert E. Lee).
BW-190m.

by David Sterritt
The Birth Of A Nation (1915) - The Birth Of A Nation

The Birth of a Nation (1915) - The Birth of a Nation

D.W. Griffith's epic production The Birth of a Nation had its United States premiere on February 8, 1915, and almost a century later it's still a strong contender for most controversial movie ever made. Its historical importance and cinematic ingenuity are unquestionable, which explains the positive side of its reputation. The negative side is explained by a single overwhelming factor - the unapologetic racism that runs through the picture from beginning to end. Based on a novel by Thomas Dixon, Jr. called The Clansman, the movie's plot is complex and sometimes confusing, but the review in Variety on March 12, 1915, summed it up in a sentence: "The Camerons of the south and the Stonemans of the north and Silas Lynch, the mulatto Lieutenant-Governor, the Civil War...the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the period of Carpet-bagging days and union reconstruction following Lee's surrender, the terrorizing of the southern whites by the newly freed blacks and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan that later overpowers the negros [sic] and gives the white men the authority rightfully theirs." Although reviewer Mark Vance displays a racial prejudice equal to Griffith's own, his high opinion of the film was echoed by many likeminded critics - and bitterly contested by others who found Griffith's technical resourcefulness a meager compensation for the picture's bigotry, insensitivity, and historical spin. Griffith claimed that his sole intention was to tell the story of the Civil War and the postwar Reconstruction era as they really happened, from his own perspective as a Southerner who accepted the outcome of the war, and that offending black Americans was the last thing he wanted to do. To this end he adapted a novel in which the KKK is the hero, and arranged for all the black characters (except some extras) to be played by white actors in blackface. Watching the film today, it's hard to believe Griffith actually thought black moviegoers - or many white ones - would enjoy his portrait of slaves and former slaves as slow-witted, servile, sexually rapacious dullards who would have ruined the nation if the KKK hadn't been invented in the nick of time. If he did think that, he was incredibly thickheaded. And so he was. Judging from historical records and film scholarship, Griffith was genuinely surprised by the uproar surrounding the movie's release. Born in rural Kentucky to a Confederate Army officer who had fought in the Civil War and returned with countless tales of Confederate heroism, Griffith saw the war and Reconstruction from a Southern perspective he never questioned. This helps account for the racism in The Birth of a Nation, but it doesn't excuse Griffith's failure to challenge the version of history he'd absorbed in childhood, especially since in other areas of life he was what we'd now call a liberal or progressive - deploring the excesses of capitalism in A Corner in Wheat (1909), for instance, and condemning various forms of bigotry in Intolerance (1916). When a 1915 editorial in the New York Globe attacked The Birth of a Nation for pandering to "depraved tastes" and fomenting "a race antipathy that is the most sinister and dangerous feature of American life," Griffith shot back a letter saying that by "following the formula of the best dramas of the world we establish our ideals by revealing the victory of right over wrong." His equation is both malevolent and simplistic: freed slaves enjoying their freedom equals wrong, the KKK murdering their liberty equals right. The Birth of a Nation cost about $110,000 to make, equivalent to several million dollars today; the battle scenes alone have been estimated at $40,000. Financing came from private investors rather than established production companies, because of the project's unusual nature and also because Griffith was now based in the Southern California area that would soon become Hollywood, far from the New York hub of the pre-1915 film industry. Griffith worked from a plot outline rather than a formal script, researching historical details with the help of four assistants. Production began on the Fourth of July in 1914 and wrapped on Halloween, and the final twelve-reel cut debuted under the film's original title, The Clansman, at Clune's Auditorium in Los Angeles, running there for seven months. By the time of its New York opening in March - at the Liberty Theater, where it played for eleven months - it had received its new and permanent title, apparently because Dixon felt the title of his novel wasn't imposing enough for so magnificent a film. Bad record-keeping has kept the movie's profits from being precisely calculated to this day, but film historian Anthony Slide reckons that it has "probably been seen by more people than any other film." While that may have changed with the advent of global blockbusters by the likes of James Cameron and Steven Spielberg, the cumulative audience for Griffith's epic has surely been of epic proportions. And no wonder, since The Birth of a Nation was a groundbreaking entertainment in its day. Longer and more exciting than any American picture to date, it lured middle-class and wealthy patrons back to the movies, which had catered to working-class audiences during the nickelodeon era. According to the official souvenir program for its first road-show engagements, 18,000 people and 3,000 horses appear on the screen; making the KKK uniforms took up more than 25,000 yards of white cloth; and nearly 200,000 feet of film were shot, edited to 12,000 for the final cut, which ran about three hours and ten minutes at the then-usual projector speed of 16 frames per second. On top of these high-end production values, the film was endorsed by no less a personage than Woodrow Wilson, the president of the United States, who remarked, after seeing it in the first-ever movie screening at the White House, "It is like writing history with Lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." Rave reviews from Wilson and many critics helped The Birth of a Nation become cinema's first blockbuster, but they didn't persuade everyone that the picture was benign. Before its New York premiere, the NAACP pushed both the motion-picture industry and national censors to condemn or at least censure the picture, winning only a few token trims with their efforts. Griffith's characteristic response to such attacks was "to insist on the sincerity of his art," in the words of biographer Richard Schickel, and "to associate his cause with the cause of free speech and a free press." Later the NAACP organized protests outside the Manhattan theater where it was playing, and an April showing in Boston resulted in a full-scale riot; but these and other expressions of outrage did little to dampen the film's popularity. Contention has arisen many times since, as when an Atlanta censorship board banned it in 1959, and when the town of Riverside, California, which had hosted the film's first prerelease screening in 1915, canceled a showing at its museum in 1978. The right to exhibit it was challenged at least 120 times between 1915 and 1973, according to film scholar Janet Steiger. The narrative energy and technical wizardry of The Birth of a Nation speak for themselves to those who view the film today. As for its ideological failings and noxious views, no one has better articulated the case against them than the pioneering social worker Jane Addams, who spoke about it with the New York Post during its initial New York run. Calling it a "pernicious caricature of the Negro race" that is both "unjust and untrue," Addams reproached it for portraying blacks as "worse than childish and brutal and vicious--actually grotesque and primitive and despicable." In remarks that ring far truer than Griffith's shifty defenses, she observed that you "can use history to demonstrate anything when you take certain of its facts and emphasize them to the exclusion of others." The glimpses of real history in The Birth of a Nation serve only to make the film more insidious, she added, promoting "the most subtle of untruths - a half truth." Those words from 1915 are worth recalling when we explore Griffith's racist blockbuster in the twenty-first century. Director: D.W. Griffith Producer: D.W. Griffith Scenario: D.W. Griffith and Frank E. Woods, based on Thomas F. Dixon, Jr.'s novel The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan Cinematographer: G.W. Bitzer Film Editing: D.W. Griffith, Joseph Henabery, James Smith, Rose Smith, Raoul Walsh Music: Joseph Carl Breil With: Lillian Gish (Elsie Stoneman), Mae Marsh (Flora Cameron), Henry Walthall (Col. Ben Cameron), Miriam Cooper (Margaret Cameron), Mary Alden (Lydia Brown), Ralph Lewis (Austin Stoneman), George Seigmann (Silas Lynch), Walter Long (Gus), Robert Harron (Tod Stoneman), Wallace Reed (Jeff), Jos. Henabery (Abraham Lincoln), Elmer Clifton (Phil Stoneman), Josephine Crowell (Mrs. Cameron), Spottiswoode Aitken (Dr. Cameron), J.A. Beringer (Wade Cameron), Maxfield Stanley (Duke Cameron), Jennie Lee (Mammy), Donald Crisp (Gen. Ulysses S. Grant), Howard Gaye (Gen. Robert E. Lee). BW-190m. by David Sterritt

The Birth of a Nation (1915) - The Birth of a Nation

Reprinted by permission of Donald Bogle from his film reference work, Blacks in American Films & Television: An Illustrated Encyclopedia (Simon & Schuster)


A legendary classic, a racist masterpiece. Technically innovative and sweeping. Director Griffith made brilliant use of the close-up, cross-cutting, rapid-fire editing, the iris, the split screen shot, and realistic and impressionistic lighting. His once-record-breaking $100,000 spectacle ran over three hours and eventually altered the entire course and concept of the feature film. But the treatment of its black characters has also made this possibly the most controversial American film ever released.

An Old South/Civil War reconstruction Era drama, The Birth of the Nation [1915] focuses on the family of kindly Dr. Cameron. On the Cameron plantation in Piedmont, South Carolina, masters and slaves are friendly. In the fields, the darkies contentedly pick cotton. Lively pickaninnies dance and perform for their white masters outside the slave quarters. Mammy joyously runs the big house. All is calm, at peace, in order during these glory days of the Old South.

Then the War breaks out. The old world of gentility collapses. A troop of Negro raiders terrorizes the Cameron family. Afterward during the Reconstruction period, carpetbaggers (led by the corrupt Senator Stoneman) and "uppity" blacks from the North move into Piedmont, exploiting and corrupting the former slaves, unleashing the sadism and bestiality believed to be innate in the Negro, turning the once-congenial "darkies" into renegades, and using them to "crush the white South under the heel of the black South." The former slaves quit work to dance. They roam the streets, shoving whites aside. They take over the political polls, disenfranchising the white citizens. A black political victory culminates in an orgiastic street celebration. Blacks dance, sing, drink, rejoice. Later they conduct a black legislative session, itself a supposed mockery of Old South ideals, in which the freed legislators are depicted as lustful, arrogant, idiotic. One bites on a chicken leg. Another sneaks a drink from a liquor bottle. Another removes his shoe and props his bare foot onto his desk. The stench created by the barefoot legislator becomes so foul that another passes a rule that everyone must wear his shoes during legislative meetings! Other rulings are also made. A title card reads: "It is moved and carried that all whites must salute Negro officers on the street." Another title card proclaims: "The helpless white minority." Still another announces: "Passage of a bill providing for the intermarriage of blacks and whites."

Matters reach a heady climax when the lusty renegade black buck Gus hotly pursues the delicate young Cameron daughter. Rather than submit, the poor thing - the Pet Sister as she's called - flees and throws herself from a cliff into the "opal gates of death." (Interestingly enough, during a showing of The Birth of a Nation - many decades later - to an all-black audience at Howard University in Washington, D.C., when the poor Pet Sister jumped to her death, the black audience stood up and cheered. The Birth of a Nation can still rouse tension and hostilities.) Later the mulatto Silas Lynch attempts to force the fair white Elsie Stoneman (played by Lillian Gish) into marrying him. Finally, when all looks lost, a group of stalwart, upright white males, wearing sheets and hoods, no less, soon have a victorious confrontation with the blacks. Defenders of white womanhood, white honor and white glory, they restore to the South everything it has lost, including white supremacy. Thus we have the birth of a nation. And the birth of the Ku Klux Klan, too!

Absurd as some of the plot of The Birth of a Nation might sound today, the film had enormous power and extraordinary effects. The final ride of the Klan was an impressive piece of movie propaganda, superbly filmed and brilliantly edited. Indeed it was so stirring that audiences screamed in terror and delight, cheering the white heroes and booing, hissing, and cursing the black baddies.

Griffith also "introduced" the mass movie audience to the black film stereotypes that were to linger in American films for the next 70-some years - the noble, loyal manageable Toms, the clownish coons, the stoic hefty mammy, the troubled "tragic" mulatto (she's Senator Stoneman's mistress), and the brutal black buck. All had appeared in previous short films; indeed they were carryovers from popular fiction, poetry, and music of the 19th century. But never had they been given such a full-blown dramatic treatment - and in a film seen the world over. Of course, the stereotypes in The Birth of a Nation were all the more disturbing and grotesque because the major black roles were played by white actors in blackface. (Real African Americans had only minor parts.)

The Birth of a Nation became one of the biggest moneymakers in movie history. At a private White House screening, President Woodrow Wilson praised the film. Like The Clansman, the Thomas Dixon novel on which it was based, the movie appealed to the nation partly because of its mythic view of the Old South and particularly because of its exploration of the great white American nightmares: interracial sex and the strong sexual black man. A scary black/white fantasy, the film's ending wiped away white America's sexual fears about the Negro and temporarily at least permitted the national psyche to relax.

Controversy, however, followed The Birth of a Nation. The NAACP launched a formal protest movement against it. (In later years when the film was re-released, there were new protests.) Afterwards the film industry, fearing controversy more than anything else, assiduously avoided any depiction of strong, aggressive, defiant sexual black men. Most of the black males audiences were to see in later films of the late 1920s and 1930s were comic, non-threatening figures such as the characters played by Stepin Fetchit and Bill "Bojangles" Robinson. The buck figure actually does not return in full force in American films until some 55 years later with such pictures as Shaft and Sweet Sweetback's Baadassss Song. At the same time, some black leaders, determined to counteract the shocking black images of The Birth of a Nation, set out to make black films with positive characters, and eventually there was a whole new wave of independent black filmmakers such as Oscar Micheaux.

Producer/Director: D.W. Griffith
Screenplay: D.W. Griffith, Frank E. Woods, Thomas F. Dixon, Jr. based on the novels The Leopard's Spots & The Clansman
Cinematography: G.W. Bitzer
Editing: D.W. Griffith, Joseph Henabery, James Smith, Rose Smith, Raoul Walsh
Costume Design: Robert Godstein
Cast: Lillian Gish (Elsie Stoneman), Mae Marsh (Flora Cameron), Henry B. Walthall (Col. Ben Cameron), Miriam Cooper (Margaret Cameron), Mary Alden (Lydia Brown), Ralph Lewis (Austin Stoneman), George Siegmann (Silas Lynch), Walter Long (Gus), Wallace Reid (Jeff), Joseph Henabery (Abraham Lincoln).
BW-185m.

The Birth of a Nation (1915) - The Birth of a Nation Reprinted by permission of Donald Bogle from his film reference work, Blacks in American Films & Television: An Illustrated Encyclopedia (Simon & Schuster)

A legendary classic, a racist masterpiece. Technically innovative and sweeping. Director Griffith made brilliant use of the close-up, cross-cutting, rapid-fire editing, the iris, the split screen shot, and realistic and impressionistic lighting. His once-record-breaking $100,000 spectacle ran over three hours and eventually altered the entire course and concept of the feature film. But the treatment of its black characters has also made this possibly the most controversial American film ever released. An Old South/Civil War reconstruction Era drama, The Birth of the Nation [1915] focuses on the family of kindly Dr. Cameron. On the Cameron plantation in Piedmont, South Carolina, masters and slaves are friendly. In the fields, the darkies contentedly pick cotton. Lively pickaninnies dance and perform for their white masters outside the slave quarters. Mammy joyously runs the big house. All is calm, at peace, in order during these glory days of the Old South. Then the War breaks out. The old world of gentility collapses. A troop of Negro raiders terrorizes the Cameron family. Afterward during the Reconstruction period, carpetbaggers (led by the corrupt Senator Stoneman) and "uppity" blacks from the North move into Piedmont, exploiting and corrupting the former slaves, unleashing the sadism and bestiality believed to be innate in the Negro, turning the once-congenial "darkies" into renegades, and using them to "crush the white South under the heel of the black South." The former slaves quit work to dance. They roam the streets, shoving whites aside. They take over the political polls, disenfranchising the white citizens. A black political victory culminates in an orgiastic street celebration. Blacks dance, sing, drink, rejoice. Later they conduct a black legislative session, itself a supposed mockery of Old South ideals, in which the freed legislators are depicted as lustful, arrogant, idiotic. One bites on a chicken leg. Another sneaks a drink from a liquor bottle. Another removes his shoe and props his bare foot onto his desk. The stench created by the barefoot legislator becomes so foul that another passes a rule that everyone must wear his shoes during legislative meetings! Other rulings are also made. A title card reads: "It is moved and carried that all whites must salute Negro officers on the street." Another title card proclaims: "The helpless white minority." Still another announces: "Passage of a bill providing for the intermarriage of blacks and whites." Matters reach a heady climax when the lusty renegade black buck Gus hotly pursues the delicate young Cameron daughter. Rather than submit, the poor thing - the Pet Sister as she's called - flees and throws herself from a cliff into the "opal gates of death." (Interestingly enough, during a showing of The Birth of a Nation - many decades later - to an all-black audience at Howard University in Washington, D.C., when the poor Pet Sister jumped to her death, the black audience stood up and cheered. The Birth of a Nation can still rouse tension and hostilities.) Later the mulatto Silas Lynch attempts to force the fair white Elsie Stoneman (played by Lillian Gish) into marrying him. Finally, when all looks lost, a group of stalwart, upright white males, wearing sheets and hoods, no less, soon have a victorious confrontation with the blacks. Defenders of white womanhood, white honor and white glory, they restore to the South everything it has lost, including white supremacy. Thus we have the birth of a nation. And the birth of the Ku Klux Klan, too! Absurd as some of the plot of The Birth of a Nation might sound today, the film had enormous power and extraordinary effects. The final ride of the Klan was an impressive piece of movie propaganda, superbly filmed and brilliantly edited. Indeed it was so stirring that audiences screamed in terror and delight, cheering the white heroes and booing, hissing, and cursing the black baddies. Griffith also "introduced" the mass movie audience to the black film stereotypes that were to linger in American films for the next 70-some years - the noble, loyal manageable Toms, the clownish coons, the stoic hefty mammy, the troubled "tragic" mulatto (she's Senator Stoneman's mistress), and the brutal black buck. All had appeared in previous short films; indeed they were carryovers from popular fiction, poetry, and music of the 19th century. But never had they been given such a full-blown dramatic treatment - and in a film seen the world over. Of course, the stereotypes in The Birth of a Nation were all the more disturbing and grotesque because the major black roles were played by white actors in blackface. (Real African Americans had only minor parts.) The Birth of a Nation became one of the biggest moneymakers in movie history. At a private White House screening, President Woodrow Wilson praised the film. Like The Clansman, the Thomas Dixon novel on which it was based, the movie appealed to the nation partly because of its mythic view of the Old South and particularly because of its exploration of the great white American nightmares: interracial sex and the strong sexual black man. A scary black/white fantasy, the film's ending wiped away white America's sexual fears about the Negro and temporarily at least permitted the national psyche to relax. Controversy, however, followed The Birth of a Nation. The NAACP launched a formal protest movement against it. (In later years when the film was re-released, there were new protests.) Afterwards the film industry, fearing controversy more than anything else, assiduously avoided any depiction of strong, aggressive, defiant sexual black men. Most of the black males audiences were to see in later films of the late 1920s and 1930s were comic, non-threatening figures such as the characters played by Stepin Fetchit and Bill "Bojangles" Robinson. The buck figure actually does not return in full force in American films until some 55 years later with such pictures as Shaft and Sweet Sweetback's Baadassss Song. At the same time, some black leaders, determined to counteract the shocking black images of The Birth of a Nation, set out to make black films with positive characters, and eventually there was a whole new wave of independent black filmmakers such as Oscar Micheaux. Producer/Director: D.W. Griffith Screenplay: D.W. Griffith, Frank E. Woods, Thomas F. Dixon, Jr. based on the novels The Leopard's Spots & The Clansman Cinematography: G.W. Bitzer Editing: D.W. Griffith, Joseph Henabery, James Smith, Rose Smith, Raoul Walsh Costume Design: Robert Godstein Cast: Lillian Gish (Elsie Stoneman), Mae Marsh (Flora Cameron), Henry B. Walthall (Col. Ben Cameron), Miriam Cooper (Margaret Cameron), Mary Alden (Lydia Brown), Ralph Lewis (Austin Stoneman), George Siegmann (Silas Lynch), Walter Long (Gus), Wallace Reid (Jeff), Joseph Henabery (Abraham Lincoln). BW-185m.

The Birth of a Nation & the Civil War Films of D.W. Griffith


Before The Birth Of A Nation (1915), almost no one went to see a movie. Instead they went to the movies, a group of short films running 15 to 30 minutes each changing every week at a small storefront in a unfashionable part of town. Each program would provide a small taste of comedy, drama and adventure performed by mostly anonymous actors. This was how exhibitors wanted the movies to be and they fought hard to keep them that way.

With The Birth Of A Nation, director D.W. Griffith exploded all that. His epic civil war story ran over three hours, had a commissioned orchestral score and played only in the best theaters at prices previously asked only for live performances. Despite the howls of the exhibitors, The Birth Of A Nation became the biggest hit of the silent era, creating the first national phenomenon for a single film and forever establishing the feature film running at least an hour as the standard form of the cinema.

However, the story and the way Griffith told it also made The Birth Of A Nation the most controversial motion picture ever made. Beginning just before the Civil War, the story tells of two families, the Stonemans from the North and the Camerons from the South as they become friends, fight against one another during the war and come back together during Reconstruction. The film's point of view is unabashedly that of a white Southerner of the period, that is, black slaves loved their masters and helped them fight the Yankees, Reconstruction was a nightmare during which ignorant, sex-crazed blacks were put in charge of whites, and the only force that could put the races back in their rightful places was the Ku Klux Klan.

This view of the war and its aftermath was not uncommon when the movie was released. Then President Woodrow Wilson had The Birth Of A Nation projected as the first film shown at the White House and famously remarked that it was "like writing history with lightning and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." Others strongly disagreed. Mass protests greeted the film in many cities, the N.A.A.C.P. and Union veteran groups called for boycotts and state censorship boards, then a rarity, began to spring up to deal with the complaints. The controversy continues to this day. As recently as 1999 the Directors Guild Of America dropped D.W. Griffith's name from their annual best director's award because he made this film.

The Birth Of A Nation has appeared before on DVD but now, as part of its Griffith Masterworks series, Kino Video has issued the movie as a two-DVD set that places the movie in its time and as a culmination of Griffith's art. Disc one contains David Shepard's 1992 restoration of the complete movie running 187 minutes with the original color tinting and accompanied by an orchestral recording of the Joseph Carl Briel score written for the film plus a short called The Making Of The Birth Of A Nation with surviving outtakes. Disc two has the sound prologue filmed for the 1930 release with Walter Huston, then starring in Griffith's Abraham Lincoln (1930) interviewing Griffith. There are also documents from the 1922 New York censor board hearing at which Griffith testified, clips from the movie's most-censored scenes, views of posters, ads and original souvenir programs, excepts from the source novel and a Photoplay interview with Griffith about the film. In addition 108 minutes worth of shorts about the Civil War directed by Griffith during 1910-11 show the development of his abilities to handle the spectacle and drama necessary to tell this story. With the exception of His Trust Fulfilled (1910), which has nitrate damage, and The Battle (1911), which is from a poor-quality print, all the shorts look marvelous for their age. A dramatic yet subtle piano score by Jon Marsalis helps this ancient cinema come alive.

Kino Video's issue of The Birth Of A Nation is likely to remain the definitive release of this title, preserving a film of immense historical importance.

For more information on The Birth of a Nation, visit Kino International. To purchase a copy of this DVDs, visit TCM's online store.

by Brian Cady

The Birth of a Nation & the Civil War Films of D.W. Griffith

Before The Birth Of A Nation (1915), almost no one went to see a movie. Instead they went to the movies, a group of short films running 15 to 30 minutes each changing every week at a small storefront in a unfashionable part of town. Each program would provide a small taste of comedy, drama and adventure performed by mostly anonymous actors. This was how exhibitors wanted the movies to be and they fought hard to keep them that way. With The Birth Of A Nation, director D.W. Griffith exploded all that. His epic civil war story ran over three hours, had a commissioned orchestral score and played only in the best theaters at prices previously asked only for live performances. Despite the howls of the exhibitors, The Birth Of A Nation became the biggest hit of the silent era, creating the first national phenomenon for a single film and forever establishing the feature film running at least an hour as the standard form of the cinema. However, the story and the way Griffith told it also made The Birth Of A Nation the most controversial motion picture ever made. Beginning just before the Civil War, the story tells of two families, the Stonemans from the North and the Camerons from the South as they become friends, fight against one another during the war and come back together during Reconstruction. The film's point of view is unabashedly that of a white Southerner of the period, that is, black slaves loved their masters and helped them fight the Yankees, Reconstruction was a nightmare during which ignorant, sex-crazed blacks were put in charge of whites, and the only force that could put the races back in their rightful places was the Ku Klux Klan. This view of the war and its aftermath was not uncommon when the movie was released. Then President Woodrow Wilson had The Birth Of A Nation projected as the first film shown at the White House and famously remarked that it was "like writing history with lightning and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." Others strongly disagreed. Mass protests greeted the film in many cities, the N.A.A.C.P. and Union veteran groups called for boycotts and state censorship boards, then a rarity, began to spring up to deal with the complaints. The controversy continues to this day. As recently as 1999 the Directors Guild Of America dropped D.W. Griffith's name from their annual best director's award because he made this film. The Birth Of A Nation has appeared before on DVD but now, as part of its Griffith Masterworks series, Kino Video has issued the movie as a two-DVD set that places the movie in its time and as a culmination of Griffith's art. Disc one contains David Shepard's 1992 restoration of the complete movie running 187 minutes with the original color tinting and accompanied by an orchestral recording of the Joseph Carl Briel score written for the film plus a short called The Making Of The Birth Of A Nation with surviving outtakes. Disc two has the sound prologue filmed for the 1930 release with Walter Huston, then starring in Griffith's Abraham Lincoln (1930) interviewing Griffith. There are also documents from the 1922 New York censor board hearing at which Griffith testified, clips from the movie's most-censored scenes, views of posters, ads and original souvenir programs, excepts from the source novel and a Photoplay interview with Griffith about the film. In addition 108 minutes worth of shorts about the Civil War directed by Griffith during 1910-11 show the development of his abilities to handle the spectacle and drama necessary to tell this story. With the exception of His Trust Fulfilled (1910), which has nitrate damage, and The Battle (1911), which is from a poor-quality print, all the shorts look marvelous for their age. A dramatic yet subtle piano score by Jon Marsalis helps this ancient cinema come alive. Kino Video's issue of The Birth Of A Nation is likely to remain the definitive release of this title, preserving a film of immense historical importance. For more information on The Birth of a Nation, visit Kino International. To purchase a copy of this DVDs, visit TCM's online store. by Brian Cady

Quotes

Stay away or I'll jump!
- Flora Cameron

Trivia

Director D.W. Griffith visualized the whole film in his mind and did not write out a script or keep written notes.

Premiered in Los Angeles with the title "The Clansman", after the novel on which it was based.

The black characters are played by white actors with make-up.

The character of Austin Stoneman is based on Thaddeus Stevens, a representative from Pennsylvania, including the details of his wig and clubfoot.

Griffith directed 13 Civil War-based one-reelers before undertaking Birth of a Nation.

Notes

[Onscreen credits were taken from a 1921 reissue print of the film.] The opening title card reads, "Griffith Feature Films produced exclusively by D. W. Griffith," followed by a title card that bears the following written statement below "DG," Griffith's trademark: "This is the trade mark of the Griffith feature films. All pictures made under the personal direction of D. W. Griffith have the name 'Griffith' in the border line, with the initials 'DG' at bottom of captions. There is no exception to this rule. DW Griffith." Another written statement appears after the production credits: "A PLEA FOR THE ART OF THE MOTION PICTURE. We do not fear censorship, for we have no wish to offend with improprieties or obscenities, but we do demand, as a right, the liberty to show the dark side of wrong, that we May illuminate the bright side of virtue-the same liberty that is conceded to the art of the written word-that art to which we owe the Bible and the works of Shakespeare." Prior to the film's action, the following written prologue appears: "If in this work we have conveyed to the mind the ravages of war to the end that war May be held in abhorrence, this effort will not have been in vain."
       The David W. Griffith Corp. copyrighted the film under the title The Birth of the Nation: Or The Clansman. According to modern sources, in addition to having Dixon's The Clansman as its literary source, the film also used material from Dixon's novel The Leopard's Spots (New York, 1902). Modern sources indicate that the film previewed in Riverside, CA on 1-2 January 1915 under the title The Clansman. The film was produced by the David W. Griffith Corp. under the auspices of the Majestic Motion Picture Co. It was financed by D. W. Griffith and Harry E. Aitken representing various investors. According to contemporary sources, the film opened under the title The Clansman in Los Angeles on February 8, 1915. Showings in Los Angeles later in the year retained that title. The film received a preview showing in New York on March 1, 1915, and had its premiere under the title The Birth of a Nation [which was on the viewed print] on March 3, 1915 in New York at the Liberty Theatre. The top ticket prices there were $2. On opening night, after the first act, Thomas Dixon appeared on stage and introduced D. W. Griffith to the audience. According to a letter dated March 3, 1915 in the NAACP Papers, African Americans were not allowed into the theater for the performance, but the organization hoped to get in at least two "very fair colored people."
       A New York Dramatic Mirror news item relates that the film was shown to President Woodrow Wilson in the East Room of the White House in February 1915, and that Griffith came from the West Coast especially to attend to the details of the presentation. Modern sources reveal that the date of the White House showing was February 18, 1915, that it was arranged to comply with the request of author Thomas Dixon, who knew Wilson from college, and that in addition to President Wilson, members of his cabinet and staff and their families attended the screening. Wilson reportedly commented about the film, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." The next night, according to modern sources, the film was shown to an invited audience in Washington, including Chief Justice Edward White and members of Congress.
       The following information regarding protests against the film by the NAACP and others is taken from information in the NAACP Papers at the Library of Congress and from news stories: Prior to the first showings of the film in Los Angeles, a committee consisting of members of the L.A. branch of the NAACP, the Ministers' Alliance and a local organization called the Forum, were given a screening on January 29, 1915, as arranged by the local censor board. The group filed a protest with the censor board, which passed the film nonetheless, after which the local branch of the NAACP appealed to the mayor and chief of police, but both said that the censor board had jurisdiction. The NAACP subsequently registered a protest with the L.A. City Council urging that the film not be shown in the city. They stated that the film made "an appeal to violence and outrage" and was designed to "excuse the lynchings and other deeds of violence committed against the Negro and to make him in the public mind a hideous monster." They cited some specific scenes they objected to, including one that was subsequently cut from the film: "The little black boy who typified slavery at the abolitionist meeting, is taken in the arms of a saintly and very portly Puritan woman; but she drops him very suddenly and decisively and displays her disgust at his offensive odor by holding her nose and turning her head." They complained, "The Negro is made to look hideous and is invested with most repulsive habits and depraved passions."
       The secretary of the local group, E. Burton Ceruti, however, praised the film's artistic merits in a letter to NAACP national secretary May Childs Nerney, stating, "it is a masterpiece ... and, from an artistic point of view, the finest thing of its kind I have ever witnessed." By late Feb, Nerney had succeeded in getting the support of the chairman of the National Board of Censorship's executive committee, Frederick C. Howe, and his wife. After the Board approved the film, Howe requested that the Board's General Committee review it. According to W. D. McGuire, Jr., the executive director of the Board, they viewed the film on March 1, 1915 and decided that certain changes should be made; McGuire wrote that they met with officers and owners of Epoch Producing Corp., who "at once offered to modify certain scenes." The General Committee met again on 12 March and voted 12-9 to pass the film with the requirement that two additional changes be made, and the producers agreed. (Nerney reported that after the vote, the committee members "cheered the author [i.e. D. W. Griffith] when he came into the room.")
       Following the Board's decision, a number of members resigned, including Howe. According to Nerney, the two most objectionable parts, the "attack of a colored man upon a white girl ending in his lynching, and the attempt of a mulatto leader of the blacks who had been educated by a white Northern man, to force the latter's daughter to marry him," remained in the film. A letter dated April 13, 1915 lists deletions that were made for showings in New York. In Part I, only "The smell incident" (the scene mentioned above taking place during the abolitionist meeting) was the only cut. In Part II, the letter continues, the deletions were, "The beating of a little white child in the presence of her mother by an old colored man who meets them on the street and who is annoyed because the child accidentally gets in his path. The showing of the dead body of 'Gus' after his murder by the Ku Klux Klan. A saloon brawl showing most degraded types of Negroes in a drunken fight. The incident in the South Carolina Legislature where a colored member takes off his shoes." (A number of these scenes are in surviving prints of the film.) In addition, the letter lists the scenes in Part II that were modified: "The incident of the Southern Colonel's refusal to shake hands with the mulatto politician in the North which is cut short. When 'Gus' approaches the white girl whom he afterwards pursues he originally said, 'Missy, I'm a captain now.' This has been changed to 'Missy, I'm a captain now and I will marry-' At the beginning of the second part a new legend has been introduced reading, 'This is an historical presentation of Reconstruction and is not meant to reflect upon any race or people of today.'
       An expansion of this sentiment is also introduced in a long legend which is run at the beginning of the performance inviting censorship. The two rape scenes have not been omitted though the first one has been shortened." The added set of introductory titles, called "A Plea for the Art of the Motion Picture," was signed by Griffith. Correspondence from September 1915 indicates that scenes had been inserted at the end of the film "purporting to show the advance of Negroes since the War"; these scenes showed Hampton Institute and other African-American schools. According to a letter dated September 20, 1915, "There was so much criticism of Hampton having lent its name that the Secretary was sent to New York to see what could be done to have these pictures cut out." A letter to a Buffalo newspaper in February 1916 states that the Hampton Institute scenes received the heartiest applause at a screening.
       The NAACP got the support of a number of influential people to try to get the film banned, including social reformers Lilian D. Ward, Jane Addams and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise. In addition, they tried to get financier Otto Kahn to influence his brother Felix, who had invested money in the Mutual Motion Picture Corp. Addams wrote about the film, "it appeals to race prejudice upon the basis of conditions of half a century ago, which have nothing to do with the facts we have to consider today. It is both unjust and untrue. The producer seems to have followed the principle of gathering the most vicious and grotesque individuals he could find among colored people, and showing them as representatives of the truth about the entire race. The same method could be followed to smirch the reputation of any race."
       In an article dated May 13, 1915, The Congregationalist and Christian World describes a visit that author Thomas Dixon paid to the newspaper's offices the day before the first showing of the film in Boston. When asked what he hoped to accomplish with the film, Dixon "expressed his desire to teach his version of the Reconstruction Period and urged at considerable length the virtues of the Ku Klux Klan.... He further emphasized his desire to create a feeling of abhorrence for colored men in the hearts of white people, especially white women, in order to stop intermarriage.... Finally, Mr. Dixon proceeded from the inference of white supremacy to argue his desire to secure the removal of all the Negroes from the United States. In order to strengthen his argument he quoted from President Lincoln, who in the last days of the war advocated colonization schemes for the ignorant slaves recently enfranchised and those about to be discharged from the Union Army."
       On April 24, 1916, the Chicago American reported a murder that occurred following a showing of the film in Lafayette, IN. After seeing the film, Henry Brocj, who had arrived from Kentucky five weeks earlier, "walked out on the main street of the city and fired 3 bullets into the body of Edward Manson, a Negro high school student, 15 years old. The boy died tonight. There was no provocation for the tragedy and Brocj is in jail under a charge of murder." No further information regarding the crime has been located.
       According to documents in the NAACP Papers, from the time of the film's first release until the end of 1931, the following governmental actions were taken either to ban the film or to cut it; some of these actions pertained to re-issues of the film, including the 1930 version with an added soundtrack: In Alaska, on October 8, 1918, the mayor of Juneau stopped the showing of the film; in California, in June 1921, the film was taken off the market, and in 1922, it was prohibited from exhibition by an ordinance passed by the City Council of Sacramento; in Connecticut, in December 1915 in New Haven, substantial cuts were made, on August 21, 1924, the exhibition of the film was canceled in New Britain, and in March 1925, the mayor of Hartford ordered two theaters to show another picture instead; in Illinois, on May 15, 1915, the mayor of Chicago refused to permit a license for the film; in Indiana, in September 1915, the film was banned in Gary; in Kansas, in January 1916, the film was banned; in Kentucky, on November 20, 1918, the mayor of Louisville stopped the exhibition of the film using an executive order; in Massachusetts, in 1915 in Boston, the rape scene involving "Gus" was nearly all cut out, in May 1921, the mayor of Boston suspended the license of a theater owner who planned to show the film, and in July 1924, in West Newton, the mayor made a request to a theater not to show the film; in Michigan, on February 14, 1931, the mayor of Detroit issued an order prohibiting the film's exhibition; in Minnesota, in August 1921, the mayor of Minneapolis refused to allow its exhibition, and on December 30, 1930, the City Council of St. Paul passed a resolution ordering the chief of police to stop the film's exhibition; in Nebraska, on March 30, 1931, the mayor of Omaha prohibited the showing of the film; in New Jersey, on December 15, 1923, the film was withdrawn in Camden, in July 1924, the Board of Commissioners of Montclair passed a resolution directing that the film not be shown, in November 1931, officials in Roselle deleted portions of the film, and on September 4, 1931, the deputy director of public safety in Jersey City forbid a theater from continuing to exhibit the film; in New York, on October 13, 1931, the mayor of Glen Cove, Long Island stopped the showing of the film; in Ohio, in October 1916, the film was banned, on June 2, 1925, the Supreme Court refused to license the film in the state, and on March 4, 1926, the attorney general ruled that the Ku Klux Klan could not show the film privately; in Oregon, in March 1931, the city council of Portland prohibited the showing; in Pennsylvania, on September 2, 1931, the mayor of Philadelphia ordered the film barred from the screen; in Rhode Island, in September 1915, the police commissioner of Providence refused to give the producers a license to show the film; and in West Virginia, in February 1919, the legislature passed a bill barring the film from the state. Many of these actions came in response to protests organized by local branches of the NAACP, which also organized protests in other jurisdictions. Protests also occurred in the cities of Morristown, NJ, Norfolk, VA, Springfield, IL, Vancouver, Canada, Atlanta, Atlantic City, Baltimore, Cleveland, Dallas, Milwaukee, Nashville, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Francisco, Spokane and Toronto.
       When the film was re-issued in May 1921 in New York, two black ex-servicemen and three black women who served in France as canteen workers were arrested for distributing a circular put out by the NAACP called "Stop the KKK Propaganda in New York." The protesters carried signs reading, "We represented America in France, why should The Birth of a Nation misrepresent us here?" They were charged with violating a city ordinance prohibiting the distribution of hand bills, circulars, or other advertising materials. The NAACP appealed a guilty verdict to make it a test case on whether "educational material" could be distributed in public in New York City, and on November 3, 1921, Judge Alfred Talley of the Court of General Sessions ruled in their favor, stating that the ordinance was designed to prevent littering of advertising matter. After the arrests, D. W. Griffith issued the following statement, which was quoted in New York Times: "It is a source of regret to me that poorly advised people are endeavoring to stir up animosity against The Birth of a Nation. The opposition is misguided, and was misguided and laid away many years ago. The leading villain in the story is a white man, who leads a misguided following into conflicts which do not reflect upon the negro. If there were the slightest ground for protest against the film it seems to me that white men would have more claim to it than negroes."
       The film was revived again in New York for one week beginning December 4, 1922. At that time, the NAACP protested to the Motion Picture Commission of the State of New York, stating, "it is our firm belief that it is being reproduced in New York City again as a part of the campaign of the Ku Klux Klan to recruit members. Much color is lent to this statement by reason of the announcements made in today's New York papers coming from the Rev. Dr. Oscar Haywood, admittedly a national organizer for the Klan to inaugurate during this week a drive for membership in New York City." The Motion Picture Commission voted to disregard the complaint. New York World reported that at the first night, the "audience seemed to be composed largely of modern Klansmen, to judge by the cheers every time a Clansman appeared on the screen."
       During this period, W. E. B. Du Bois, Director of Publications and Research for NAACP, sent a memo to Walter White, the organization's assistant secretary of the NAACP, concerning their fight to get the film banned, which he wrote "illustrates the peculiar contradictions into which the Negro problem often forces this organization," as the NAACP "stands for liberty: physical liberty, political liberty, and particularly liberty in artistic expression." After documenting that the number of lynchings of blacks per year, from 1915 until 1922, was greater than one per week, and that, "The chief alleged excuse for this lynching was the attacks upon white women by colored men," he reasoned, regarding liberty in artistic expression, that The Birth of a Nation presented "a special case. A new art was used, deliberately, to slander and vilify a race. There was no chance to reply. We had neither the money nor the influence.... What were we to do? We decided to try to make the authorities stop the picture on the ground that it was a public menace; that it was not art, but vicious propaganda." He ended the memo with the statement, "We are aware now as then that it is dangerous to limit expression, and yet, without some limitations civilization could not endure."
       The stand that the NAACP took in trying to get the film banned was criticized by the American Civil Liberties Union. In a letter dated April 25, 1939, Director Roger N. Baldwin wrote to Walter White, now Executive Secretary of the NAACP, that efforts to ban the film "are inevitably a boomerang. The precedent established will work against films favorable to Negroes, opposed by the other side.... Of course there can be no objection to protests to motion picture distributors nor to picketing. But when appeal is made to the public authorities to take action, it crosses the line of legitimate pressure, and invades the field of censorship." In a letter dated May 5, 1939, Baldwin argued, "public officials should not use their discretion in permitting or banning films because of their content. If one film can be banned on that ground, any film can be." In a letter dated June 17, 1939, Baldwin wrote, "Any exception from the general principles of freedom for all forms of expression opens the door to official censorship." He asked White, "Can't your Board of Directors be persuaded to take a line drawing that distinction?"
       The issue was brought up again in 1950 when the film was revived again and picketed again at a New York theater. In a letter dated May 19, 1950, Thurgood Marshall, chief of the legal-defense section of NAACP, wrote to Roy Wilkins, editor of the organization's journal The Crisis, "As I understand it, we are opposed to southern cities and states banning pictures which place the Negro in a favorable light. Do we continue to take that position and at the same time take the position that pictures such as Birth of a Nation should be censured by governmental authorities? You will note that this question does not in any wise interfere with the question of picketing such pictures as the Birth of a Nation which we have always done and which I am thoroughly in favor of. When we get to the question of governmental censorship, we get into an awfully tough problem. At any rate, I think it should be passed on by the Committee on Administration."
       In late 1932, Walter White met with William H. Short, Director of the Motion Picture Research Council to discuss the Payne Fund Studies, a psychological survey Short's organization had undertaken to gather and assess information on "attitudes as affected by motion pictures." In a memo about the meeting, White noted that the study had determined that The Birth of a Nation "produced an increase in unfavorable attitude toward the negro among the children examined." Short expressed the hope that evidence from the study could be used in the NAACP's fight to have the film banned, but no indication that the study's findings were actually used by NAACP has been located.
       The original programs and reviews list George Andre Beranger as J. A. Beringer, the character of "Mammy" as "Cyndy," and actor John French as the character "Duke Cameron." Wallace Reid's name was spelled "Reed" in original programs and reviews. Some programs and reviews omit the character "Nelse" and list William De Vaull as the character "Jake." A news item credits scenarist Frank E. Woods with "intricate work in assembling in the cutting room." A broadsheet notes that G.A.R. vets who took part in the battle at Petersburg, VA assisted Griffith in laying out trenches. Listings in the MPSD credit J. A. Barry as executive and producing assistant to Griffith, and Henry I. McMahon as press representative.
       According to a news item in February 1916, Southern Amusement Corp. sued Epoch Producing Corp. in the Supreme Court for $500,000 because, they claimed, on May 6, 1906 Thomas Dixon gave them the sole dramatic rights to The Clansman. No additional information has been located concerning this suit. According to the October 21, 1916 MPSD, Samuel De Vall, who worked in films as a superintendent of art departments and technical director, and F. B. Good, a cinematographer, worked in some capacity on this film. In January 1938, the Washington Herald reported that the film was going to be remade in New York by D. W. Griffith, with Wallace Ford in the role of "The Little Colonel." A March 13, 1940 Washington Times-Herald article stated that Harry E. Aitken, president of Epoch Producing Co., was planning to remake the film with a new director, although Griffith would supervise.
       Modern sources indicate the following additional credits: Chief asst dir George Siegmann; Assistant Director Monte Blue, William Christy Cabanne, Elmer Clifton, Donald Crisp, Howard Gaye, Fred Hamer, Erich von Stroheim, Herbert Sutch, Tom Wilson, Baron von Winther; Assistant Camera Karl Brown; Music D. W. Griffith and Joseph Carl Briel; Film Editor James and Rose Smith; Master carpenter Frank "Huck" Wortman; Special Effects "Fireworks" Wilson; Cast Violet Wilkey (Flora Cameron as a child), Elmo Lincoln (White-arm Joe and eight other roles), Alberta Lee (Mrs. Lincoln), William Freeman (Sentry at hospital), Olga Grey (Laura Keene), Eugene Pallette (Union soldier), Mme. Sul-te-Wan, Erich von Stroheim, and Gibson Gowland. John Ford, in interviews, claimed that he played one of the clansmen. Modern sources note that battle scenes were shot at a location which later became the Universal studio lot, and other scenes were shot at Calexico, CA.

Miscellaneous Notes

Released in United States Spring March 3, 1915

Released in United States February 8, 1915

Released in United States 1973

Castle Hill Productions acquired distribution rights from the Killiam Collection.

Broadcast in USA over Turner Classic Movies (TCM) October 29, 1995.

"Birth of a Nation" brought a storm of protest, led by the NAACP, and was successfully banned in many cities.

Selected in 1992 for inclusion in the Library of Congress' National Film Registry.

reels 12

Released in United States Spring March 3, 1915

Released in United States February 8, 1915 (Premiered in Los Angeles February 8, 1915 as "The Clansman".)

Released in United States 1973 (Shown at FILMEX: Los Angeles International Film Exposition (The Great American Films) November 15 ¿ December 16, 1973.)