skip navigation
Wild Rovers

Wild Rovers(1971)

TCM Messageboards
Post your comments here
ADD YOUR COMMENT>

share:
Remind Me

TCMDb Archive MaterialsView all archives (0)

DVDs from TCM Shop

Wild Rovers An aging cowboy joins up with... MORE > $15.95 Regularly $17.99 Buy Now

USER REVIEWS

user reviews

See Detailed Ratings
    Acting of Lead Performers
    Acting of Supporting Cast
    Director
    Music Score
    Title Sequence
  • No Ratings Available Add Yours Now
    Screenplay
    Cinematography
    Historical Importance
    Would You Recommend?
  • 0 Member Ratings

Add your ratings! Each of the detailed ratings you select will result in a cumulative score for this film.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

    Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
    Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
    Rate the Director
    Rating of the Music Score
    Rating of the Title Sequence
    Screenplay
    Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
    Importance in Cinema history
    Would you recommend for fans of this genre
Submit Ratings Cancel Write a Review Read Reviews

*By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use. TCM will use your personal information consistent with our Privacy Policy

NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE

The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.

  • wild rovers

    • kevin sellers
    • 5/7/18

    I agree with previous reviewer James Higgins that this movie is absurdly long (I mean, an OVERTURE? And an INTERMISSION? Who do you think you are, Blake old fellow? Cecil Goddamn DeMille?) and tries to tackle too many sub plots (let me list a few: Sheep/Cattle Wars, Buckman husband and wife conflict, Greedy Banker And Wife, Buckman sibling rivalry, Maybelle's Whorehouse, and that's just off the top of my head) but I'd be dishonest if said I didn't have a good time watching it. Blake Edwards' screenplay is a bit on the talky/corny side (i.e. that bathetic last soliloquy Bill Holden says for Ryan O'Neal) but he has a good ear for the wisecrack (Moses Gunn's telling Holden that the fact that they were Army buddies "gets you little and your friend nothing") or the telling comment (i.e. Joe Don Baker's lamenting that he's been born into the wrong family) that instantly illuminates a character and his direction of the climactic shootout in the cantina is as good as anything you'll see in Peckinpah. As for the acting, it's all good, with special kudos to the two leads, Karl Malden and Lynn Carlin as the ill matched Buckmans, the aforesaid Joe Don Baker and Moses Gunn, and Victor French as a whoring, dyspeptic sheriff. Give it a very solid B.

  • look on the bright side. it is not s.o.b.

    • a.morris
    • 3/7/18

    a story that has not become more popular over time. it probably will never be. maybe some people would like the script if they could read it rather than watch it. I thought the acting.. locations.. camera work were fine. not the best western but not the worst. it had an interesting idea to it. people do not like the execution of it.

  • Dumb movie and a waste of time

    • wd73383
    • 7/27/16

    Nothing worth watching here.

  • Don't waste your time on this stupid movie

    • wd73383
    • 7/27/16

    A typical movie from the early 1970s trying to be realistic but ending up being dumb and phony. Who thinks people actually act and talk like the movie's characters? And, who thinks that putting a pretty face in a movie makes it worthwhile entertainment? Just about the nicest thing I can say is this movie is so damn boring that it's surprising someone actually financed it.

  • Wild Rovers Review

    • Jan White
    • 9/4/11

    I agree with the NY Times review of this movie (link below). I found it funny and one of the most realistic Westerns I have seen. The puppy peeing on Frank's shirt was genius! Who expected that? http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A0CEEDE1330E73BBC4C51DFB066838A669EDE

  • Wild Rovers (1971)

    • James Higgins
    • 12/8/09

    This western is highly regarded and although it isn't bad I found it to be very very slow moving and overlong. Granted, I am not a big fan of westerns, and I suppose this one is better than most. The acting is good, as is the cinematography. Will be much more appreciated for those who enjoy the genre.

  • Your Name
  • Your Email (optional)
  • Your Location (optional)
      Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
      Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
      Rate the Director
      Rating of the Music Score
      Rating of the Title Sequence
      Screenplay
      Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
      Importance in Cinema history
      Would you recommend for fans of this genre

  • Title of your Review
  • Your Review

    Character Limit! You have reached the 2,000 word character limit for this review.

  • Preview & Submit Cancel Submit Review Go Back
Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

Click the button below to read reviews and see your posting:

Close Detailed Ratings (optional)

*We protect your personal infortmation and will not provide it to anyone without your consent. For a complete explanation, please refer to TCM's Privacy Policy. By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use.