skip navigation
The Curse of Frankenstein

The Curse of Frankenstein(1957)

Contribute

FOR The Curse of Frankenstein (1957) YOU CAN

UPLOAD AN IMAGE SUBMIT A VIDEO OR MOVIE CLIP ADD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WRITE YOUR OWN REVIEW

TCM Messageboards
Post your comments here
ADD YOUR COMMENT>

share:
Remind Me

TCMDb Archive MaterialsView all archives (0)

USER REVIEWS

user reviews

See Detailed Ratings
    Acting of Lead Performers
    Acting of Supporting Cast
    Director
    Music Score
    Title Sequence
  • No Ratings Available Add Yours Now
    Screenplay
    Cinematography
    Historical Importance
    Would You Recommend?
  • 0 Member Ratings

Add your ratings! Each of the detailed ratings you select will result in a cumulative score for this film.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

    Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
    Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
    Rate the Director
    Rating of the Music Score
    Rating of the Title Sequence
    Screenplay
    Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
    Importance in Cinema history
    Would you recommend for fans of this genre
Submit Ratings Cancel Write a Review Read Reviews

*By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use. TCM will use your personal information consistent with our Privacy Policy

NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE

The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.

  • The Frankenstein Question

    • H.A.C.
    • 10/18/17

    Love is blind- but should it be? What reason is there for mortal man to create 'life'? If God created man in His image, what form would the man-made life assume? If man-made life rejected its creator, what then- or would it be programmed to worship & serve its creator? What manner of man can shoulder this responsibility? Does man as creator possess such love for his creature that he (man) could sacrifice himself to save it from failure? Might man-made life become another minority against which discrimination is prohibited? Do we refer to the animated flesh as 'humananly challenged' rather than monster? What did either movie version or the novel itself (as grotesquely fascinating as they are) hope to create?!

  • curse of frankenstein

    • kevin sellers
    • 10/17/16

    I disagree with the reviewers below who say this 1957 remake is as good or better than the 1930s originals from director James Whale. As evidence let's discuss the use of the old, blind guy in both this film and "Bride Of Frankenstein." In Whale's masterpiece we have the monster bonding with the one person who does not, because he cannot, see him as a grotesque. This both humanizes the monster and critically comments on the society around him, thus giving the earlier film greater depth and resonance. In Terence Fisher's Hammer remake the old, blind guy is simply one more of the monster's victims and his death has very little dramatic or emotional impact. Also militating against greatness is the too garish color of the 1957 remake as opposed to the properly moody, light and shadow cinematography of the black and white originals. However, just because "Curse Of Frankenstein" is not as good as "Bride Of Frankenstein" does not mean that it should be consigned to the charnel house of horror flics. Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee are certainly equal to, if not better, than Colin Clive and Boris Karloff (although no one in the 1957 movie even comes close to Ernest Thesiger of "Bride" fame for pure, unadulterated vileness) and Terence Fisher's direction is well paced and properly low key. So let's give it a solid B. P.S. Fantastic makeup job on Christopher Lee's monster. Kind of a dead fish, ghastly white (or "toad belly white" as Huck Finn said about his dad's creepy skin.) Bravo makeup man, Phil Leakey! Guy shoulda gotten an Oscar nomination.

  • Two Grat Actors

    • PeteChris
    • 6/18/15

    The start of the horror films of Hammer.All actors are the best here.As good as Karloff's monster/Universal.

  • Hammer-time

    • donoharm
    • 10/25/14

    Great Frankenstein flick,a class act all the way.Features such greats as Cushing,Lee,Urquhart

  • Great take on Mary Shelly's classic novel

    • Dan Grissom
    • 8/12/12

    Hammer films started a franchise with this outstanding color re-telling of Mary Shelly's 'Frankenstein'. Of course it does not follow the novel but it also does not follow Universal's famous 1931 version starring Boris Karloff. I remember watching this with my son a few years back and he says, 'Dad, these people are good actors!' That pretty much sums it up. Four stars.

  • Good Frankenstein movie

    • Bart
    • 10/31/10

    Great pairing of Cushing and Lee,can see how they probably enjoyed working together.Thoroughly enjoyed this outing

  • Your Name
  • Your Email (optional)
  • Your Location (optional)
      Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
      Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
      Rate the Director
      Rating of the Music Score
      Rating of the Title Sequence
      Screenplay
      Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
      Importance in Cinema history
      Would you recommend for fans of this genre

  • Title of your Review
  • Your Review

    Character Limit! You have reached the 2,000 word character limit for this review.

  • Preview & Submit Cancel Submit Review Go Back
Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

Click the button below to read reviews and see your posting:

Close Detailed Ratings (optional)

*We protect your personal infortmation and will not provide it to anyone without your consent. For a complete explanation, please refer to TCM's Privacy Policy. By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use.