skip navigation
The Caretakers

The Caretakers(1963)

  • Monday, March 23 @ 06:30 AM (ET) - Reminder REMINDER
Up
Down

TCM Messageboards
Post your comments here
ADD YOUR COMMENT>

share:
Remind Me

TCMDb Archive MaterialsView all archives (0)

DVDs from TCM Shop

The Caretakers A progressive psychiatrist... MORE > $14.99 Regularly $19.95 Buy Now

USER REVIEWS

user reviews

See Detailed Ratings
    Acting of Lead Performers
    Acting of Supporting Cast
    Director
    Music Score
    Title Sequence
  • No Ratings Available Add Yours Now
    Screenplay
    Cinematography
    Historical Importance
    Would You Recommend?
  • 0 Member Ratings

Add your ratings! Each of the detailed ratings you select will result in a cumulative score for this film.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

    Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
    Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
    Rate the Director
    Rating of the Music Score
    Rating of the Title Sequence
    Screenplay
    Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
    Importance in Cinema history
    Would you recommend for fans of this genre
Submit Ratings Cancel Write a Review Read Reviews

*By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use. TCM will use your personal information consistent with our Privacy Policy

NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE

The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.

  • What's wrong with people

    • Rayleigh
    • 7/29/12

    I don't know why this movies rating are so low! I myself absolutely loved it, although I could do with out Lorna's husband whistling everytime he's used the letter "s".

  • Crawford In The Cuckoo's Nest

    • Bruce Reber
    • 6/14/10

    I have seen just about every film dealing with psychiatric hospitals and the mentally ill, and "The Caretakers" (1963) starring Joan Crawford (in another role totally unsuited for her) has to be the absolute worst of the lot. "The Snake Pit", "The Cobweb" and "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest" are way superior films in their treatment of the subject of mental health. Joan plays Lucretia Terry, a psychiatrist who arrives at a mental hospital and proceeds to do battle with the administrator and nurses, and finds she has much trouble trying to help the patients. This was the last film Joan did before making all those awful horror films ("Strait Jacket", "I Saw What You Did", "Berserk", and who can forget the biggest stinkbomb of all, "Trog"). "The Caretakers" has a certain campy quality too-it was directed by Hall Bartlett, the same guy who did "Zero Hour" (1957), the classic camp airline disaster film. Definitely another one Joan should have passed on. In my reviews of other films Joan Crawford did late in her career (after 1962, when she did "Whatever Happened To Baby Jane"), as whoever reads them knows, I totally panned them because they were the worst films she made and they deserved it.

  • Joan Crawford

    • Myrone
    • 6/5/09

    This is one horrible film!

  • Sadistic Psychiatric Nurse

    • Zachry
    • 5/31/09

    Since I advocate for people with disabilities, the depictions of sadistic malpractice by the psychiatric nurse (Joan Crawford) is ablistic. Miss Crawford was too unstable to make good decisions about the types of characters she played and shouldn't have attempted to remain in show business. Films like this and much worse ones make my point.

  • From tomb to insane asylum, again

    • pburnsky56
    • 5/23/09

    Nodding in agreement with "Christy," then adding, why in heaven's name directors were untombing Joan Crawford from her mausoleum a decade after her career was and she looked dead, is patently clear: for her name's pop-cult draw. Not only does her presence provide the worst sexist stereotype of women possible, she's drunk while'performaning' and has been desperate enough to take a role that's loathsome. The screenplay's dull, the rest of the cast's acting's more 1960's TV movie below-average. To think that the cast & crew were paid seems unjust.

  • Waste of time!

    • Christy
    • 9/28/08

    Good message-but this movie is so boring & extremely unrealistic.I didn't care about any of the characters-all seemed very shallow and cliched. The performances are good-but overall it's just empty.

  • Your Name
  • Your Email (optional)
  • Your Location (optional)
      Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
      Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
      Rate the Director
      Rating of the Music Score
      Rating of the Title Sequence
      Screenplay
      Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
      Importance in Cinema history
      Would you recommend for fans of this genre

  • Title of your Review
  • Your Review

    Character Limit! You have reached the 2,000 word character limit for this review.

  • Preview & Submit Cancel Submit Review Go Back
Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

Click the button below to read reviews and see your posting:

Close Detailed Ratings (optional)

*We protect your personal infortmation and will not provide it to anyone without your consent. For a complete explanation, please refer to TCM's Privacy Policy. By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use.