- Acting of Lead Performers
- Acting of Supporting Cast
- Music Score
- Title Sequence
- Historical Importance
- Would You Recommend?
0 Member Ratings
NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE
The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.
Thumbnail Picture is from Camille!
- R G
I have seen on a few occasions the wrong thumbnail for the movie like this one. Great movie.
best of the badmen.
basil Rathbone was suppose to be considered to be the bad guy in this story. the problem is.. the way he played him was excellent. he was more likeable than greta garbo as her character. if people really took the idea of who played the best bad guys in the history of film.. seriously..he would probably be number one. he always had a goal.. a purpose.. a reasoning. only ricardo montalban rivaled him in playing a bad guy in a type of filmed story.
I Prefer To British Incarnation
Maybe others like Leigh,but I don't think Garbo is to be sneered at.Karenin is perfectly played by Rathbone,but March leaves a lot to be desired as a wooden block of wood.
Worth It For Rathbone
Have long watched this to see Basil in his glory days.Maybe his Karenin was non-empathetic,but he's gorgeous!
Would Gladly Have Rathbone Anyday
- Fred Rathbone
Maybe she was a bored housewife,but she was a cuckold.Should have just taken her son and left,but was stupid enough to fall for wimpy March,who's supposed to be the big hero.Big dud more like it
Doomed Love Story
- Fred Rathbone
Don't know or care if true to the book.Great production,only drag is March,and I like him,usually.To me,he's more cruel than Karenin,until Anna is barred from her son's life.She may have fared better if she waited for him to grow up and out of Karenin's clutches.Great work seeing Freddie and Basil in another classic,this time father and son vs stepdad.Felt Garbo was kinda boring,more the aggressor to lover than other way around.
Basil Rathbone is Great
In the TCM article, they never mention Rathbone as Karenin. It's not a very big role, but Rathbone manages to show that Karenin suffers too. He is hard and cold, but still he suffers from Anna's indifference and when he sees his son's obvious preference for his mother. We don't like Karenin in this story, but Rathbone makes him hard, cold, unbending, cruel and human.
Very deep movie. The final scene is heartbreaking.
One of Garbo's Best
How could anyone say that Norma Shearer would be better than Garbo in this film? She won the NY Critics Award that year for Anna K. It's not my favorite Garbo film, but she does a wonderful job as always, especially the scenes with her son.
Would Be Better With Norma Shearer
Loved Basil,but you can have the rest
- Mark Sutch
Este filme um clssico. Maravilhoso ver a diva Greta Garbo interpretando Anna Karenina. Uma mulher que sofre por no conseguir o divrcio por ser infeliz no casamento e por sofrer por no ser livre para viver seu amor pelo Conde Vronsky. Os dois se tornam amantes. A Greta interpreta divinamente esta personagem, pois o semblante de sua personagem de culpa, angstia at do prprio adultrio que era considerado um tabu na poca do filme. Um filme baseado no romance de Leo Tolstoy. Eu fiquei decepcionada pelo filme no estar no acervo de filmes do TCM, pois eu como telespectadora acho um pecado no ter um filme clssico como este. E at para que ns telespectadores tenhamos a oportunidade de ver o filme que j deve ter sido lanado em DVD. A Greta uma diva. Anna Karenina um grande filme em todos os sentidos.
Inferior to Vivien Leigh version
- Jarrod McDonald
In many ways, this first sound version of 'Anna Karenina' looks to be a success. But when compared with the British version of 1947, starring Vivien Leigh, one can see how lacking it is. Let's look at what it has, followed by what it doesn't have, in comparison to the later project. What it has: a huge MGM budget; Garbo in her prime; excellent cinematography; and some other fine stars from MGM's glory days, including May Robson, Freddie Bartholomew, and Basil Rathbone (who is very good). What it doesn't have: fidelity to Tolstoy's classic story; a willingness to subdue Garbo so that she is playing Anna instead of herself; and a tighter economy of scenes. The British version fares much better. It eliminates the clunky scene with March and the men at the beginning and focuses immediately on Anna, visiting Moscow by train. It also allows Tolstoy's dialogue to play out as it was originally written. In the Hollywood version, producer David Selznick, whom I usually like, has added a lot of contemporary dialogue about how a man needs his work but should value his wife. There is also a phony epilogue added at the end, after Anna's death. This is not Tolstoy, but it is Tolstoy according to Selznick. Also, Selznick has added scenes that feature Anna and her son, so as to beef up Freddie Bartholomew's part. The British film shows just how restricted Anna is in getting to see how son one last time. As for the lead actresses, I don't think Garbo really delved into the part. Leigh, in contrast, absorbed Tolstoy's character, and imbued Anna with a haunted sense of life, choice, consequence and fate.
A Russian Tragedy - A Movie Triumph
- Paul Conrad Jackson
I will always marvel at how this complex classical novel could be brought to the screen. Yet, I marvel the same about Doctor Zhivago. Like Zhivago, filmed decades later, Anna Karenina captures the lavish Russian lifestyle of the era. Both are very atmospheric. And Greta Garbo's beauty simply shines out. Both novels, of course, end in tragedy, but both movies are triumphant masterpieces.